|
Evolution
- Natural Selection - Noah's Ark |
|
As more and more scientists acknowledge the futility
in explaining the origins of the "species" within the
rubric of mutation-driven Darwinian evolution, alternative explanations
are being viewed with keen eyes. Natural selection does indeed
occur in the animal kingdom, but not in the manner that has been
proponed by mainstream scientists. Realistically, natural selection's
validity can be demonstrated within the animal "kinds,"
but not between the animal "kinds" as has been popularly
and stubbornly maintained by Darwinists.
Genetic science reveals great variation within
the "kinds" of animals, such as within the cat "kind."
Lions and tigers can mate and resultantly produce offspring (ligers):
this proves that lions and tigers came from common ancestors.
Hereford cattle and buffalos can mate with offspring (cattlelo)
resulting, thus proving that these two "species" came
from common ancestors. The commonality of ancestors for "species"
within animal "kinds" tells us that the ancestors had
larger gene pools than the highly varied and naturally selected
offspring which are observed in nature today.
Logically, it seems that the huge number of "species"
of animals in the world today naturally selected from a far fewer
number of ancestors. Therefore, all the "species" of
today's animals could have originated from a far fewer number
of animal "kinds" that survived the Deluge on Noah's
Ark, as confirmed by hundreds of pagan tribal legends from around
the globe. Evidently, all the "species" of air-breathing
animals naturally selected from only about 20,000 animals that
rode out the Flood.
Similarly, people from different "races"
can mate and produce offspring, therefore the "races"
necessarily derived from common ancestors. The "races"
are obviously not evolving independently (with some races to show
superiority over others, according to Darwin, Hitler, and other
racists), but are a manifestation of natural selection within
the human "kind." Apparently, the "races"
of humanity naturally selected from ancestors of a much larger
gene pool, as to allow the physical variations that we see within
humankind today.
to learn about the true nature of biological, geological and astronomical
history.
|
| Volcanoes
- Plate Tectronics - Earthquakes |
|
Why do
many "extinct" volcanoes look as if they could come
alive at any moment? Are these volcanoes really many millions
of years of age? As it turns-out, the mountain ranges and volcanoes
uplifted a surprisingly "short" time ago, as confirmed
by a myriad of geophysical indicators. The dating methods for
dating lava rocks are fatally flawed, and yet are depended upon
to confirm preconceived notions of Darwinian earth history.
Rapid magnetic reversals of the earth's magnetic field (as reflected
in sedimentary and volcanic rocks' mineral orientations) indicate
run-away plate tectonics, a "short" time ago. "Run-away
plate tectonics" suggests a global geological upheaval unparalleled
in earth history. The evidence confirms this catastrophe which
remains in the minds of men and women, as they receive this knowledge
from their patriarchs.
Mainstream science has adopted the Darwinian world-view, and then
has tailored other disciplines, such as geology, to conform to
the "required" long time-frame for earth history. The
mountain-chains and volcanoes of the world do in fact "appear
fresh" and catastrophically originated, contrary to the usual
analyses. The residual effects of this catastrophe are seen in
the active volcanism in the world today.
If you want to read a cogent and well-documented account of
earth history,
,and see how the evidence corroborates the Biblical account.
|
| Dinosaurs |
|
The Loch Ness Monster
sightings, the dragon sightings in the Congo, British government
records speaking of flying dragons, ancient historians' precise
descriptions of dragons in China, India, Africa, and Europe: are
these all the result of hallucination or deception? Since the
presence of organic material in many dinosaur fossils necessitates
their entombment in sedimentary layers "recently," accounts
of dinosaurs (dragons) in literature and oral traditions should
not surprise us.
Obviously, the veracity of only one of these sightings
blows a massive hole in Darwinian notions about biological evolution,
and the presence of organic material in dinosaur fossils suggests
their "recent" deposition within flood-caused sedimentary
layers, thus dealing another mortal wound to Darwinian believability.
The evidence is overwhelming that earth history is not as it seems
(according to mainstream science).
Dinosaurs allegedly lived many millions of years
ago when inland seas supposedly covered much of the continents
(a result of a mysterious rise in sea-level). The fossils of dinosaurs
resulted from their deaths and supposed slow and gradual covering-over
by sediments. However, when an animal dies today in or near water,
it rots, degrades, bacteria eat it up, and within a matter of
weeks, there is nothing left to be fossilized. Apparently, mainstream
science has propagated a myth regarding the origin of dinosaur
fossils.
Do you dare to investigate an account of true
earth history that is confirmed by solid science? If so,
and enjoy a mind-boggling confirmation of God's account of history.
|
| Ice Age |
|
Mainstream scientists
have difficulty explaining the cause of the Ice Age because they
do not realize that the dense cloud-cover necessary for a massive
snow/ice blitz must have resulted from high water-evaporation rates
from a warmer ocean. The Ice Age is generally associated with a
colder climate, and thus colder ocean temperatures, when actually
the Ice Age climate must have been warmer in the winters, but cooler
in the summers. (The dense cloud-cover from evaporation off warmer
ocean-waters caused this seemingly contradictory climatic condition.)
Ancient navigational maps reveal geomorphological features of Antarctica
that are currently a mile under ice, proving that the maps were
drawn before the Ice Age had reached its peak. The structures of
many ancient civilizations have been discovered on the sea-floor
(near the shoreline) that prove their existence before the Ice Age
ice-pack had melted. Legends of the ancients speak of the Ice Age
and its associated higher rainfall rates in the more southerly latitudes.
The evidence suggests a "recent" Ice Age resulting from
higher ocean-water temperatures that occurred during the times of
the ancient Sumerian, Egyptian, Indus, and Olmec civilizations.
What caused the warmer ocean temperatures that resulted in the Ice
Age? The answer may surprise you. We have been propagandized with
"theories" of an old earth and universe that defy sound
science and anthropology. The true history of the earth and universe
is precisely outlined in Genesis, and the evidentiary trail guides
an open-minded soul to a knowledge of its veracity.
Do you dare examine the facts that confirm God's account of history?
If so,
and enjoy a mind-boggling journey of enlightenment. |
| Astronomy |
The characteristics of
the universe suggest (believe it or not) its relatively recent inception.
We have been bombarded with scientific theories that propone its
age as being many billions of years, when in reality, all the indicators
point to a "young" Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, and
cosmos. The evidences for the "youth" of the universe
have been shielded from the masses through the dogmatic insistence
by mainstream scientists that the "Big Bang" caused the
universe many billions of years ago.
Actually, the Big Bang Theory is predicated upon two mutually contradictory
presuppositions that are not mentioned when this theory is propagated.
If this contradiction were admitted by mainstream astronomers, the
possibility of gravitational time dilation during the formation
of the universe would have to be acknowledged. Thusly, the distant
stars need not be billions of years old (because the light from
them did not necessarily require billions of years to reach us).
Deterioration rates of cosmological entities suggest their "recent"
formation, and a plethora of evidences from many scientific disciplines
suggest a young earth, a "recent" development of the "species,"
and accordingly, the veracity of the Genesis account of history.
This account dovetails perfectly with sound astronomy and earth
science, and is an all- encompassing synopsis of that which solid
science indicates. Most of us have been duped by theories which
have no basis in fact, and therefore, we flounder in a malaise of
propaganda.
Should you dare to investigate the overwhelming evidences that confirm
traditional accounts of astronomical and earth history,
for an informational source that will open your eyes. |
|
