| Mainstream science shrieks with horror at the thought
of evidences for the Global Flood Model (GFM) being presented in public
forums. They cry foul and say that there is no basis for the GFM, and
even more emphatically thereafter, they whine that to allow this alternative
(and demonstrably valid) model to be widely presented would undermine
the precepts of scientific progress.
I debated in the New York Times science chat room for about a year,
and the only scientific "breakthroughs" predicated upon Darwinian
theory that could be cited by my foes in the chat room were the development
of advanced traffic-flow solutions and airplane wing designs. Therefore,
we are supposed to believe that Darwinian evolution is a reality within
which all valid science is complimentarily interwoven? It is obvious
(as evidenced by my foes' two lame citations) that scientific progress
has nothing to do with Darwinian theory.
The Global Flood Model (GFM) nicely rationalizes the observed variation
that we see within the various kinds of animals (for genetic studies),
and the vast sedimentary layers stacked like pancakes upon the continents
with billions of creatures entombed therein nicely corroborate the GFM
(for geophysical studies), therefore, the GFM is actually a superior
model upon which to frame hypotheses for potential scientific breakthroughs.
For many obvious reasons, the scientific establishment does not want
this model of superior explanatory power to be allowed fair competition
in the marketplace of ideas because the Darwinian model does not match
reality, whereas, the GFM has much explanatory power, and therefore
predictably, Darwinists have been advised to not debate Creationists.
Since the GFM is alleged idiocy (by most mainstream scientists), why
do they shun opportunities to hypothetically trounce the alleged idiots
in debates?
This situation is a prime example of how scientific misperception, apathy,
and status-quo allegiance can hinder intellectual honesty and the free
exchange of ideas, much to the detriment of scientific progress. And
yet the Darwinists who dominate the schools and the media, and who claim
that the Global Flood Model is anti-science, they are ironically the
ones who are anti-science, as evidenced by their fear of openly discussing
the issues. I hope that you join me in disseminating the superior GFM
to the public, and please encourage Darwinists to debate Creationists,
then many eyes would be opened.
Please consult my website www.GenesisVeracity.com, and I think you will
find Articles #10 and #11 to be of great interest to you, as the information
therein establishes that the ancients were accurately measuring and
navigating the earth during the Ice Age. For interview, I can be e-mailed
or called at (713) 784 6618.
|